|
FCASV
Newsletter • Summer 2008 (Continued from page 1)
 |
Current
Trends and Issues with the
Crimes Compensation Trust Fund
In this article:
Most Important State
Trends:
• $10 million sweep by the
Florida Legislature
• Increase in benefit payouts
Impact:
Benefit Reductions
Most Important Federal Trend:
• $35 million decrease in funding available for
VOCA victim services grants
Impact:
VOCA Victim Services Grant reductions
|
No programs or services in the
state of Florida will ultimately be spared the impact of federal
and state budget cuts and revenue shortfalls that are accompanying
the national and statewide economic downturn. And more cuts
may well be on the horizon. In this climate, it is important
to look carefully at the various trends impacting the overall
health of the Crimes Compensation Trust Fund and the availability
of benefits for victims of crime.
Trust Fund Sweep
and Fund Shifts
While legislators have a variety of tools at their disposal
to increase the state’s revenue, including closing corporate
and sales tax loopholes, proposals that tend to be unpopular
with larger business interests continue to lack momentum in
the Florida legislature. Sweeps of state trust funds with
cash reserves eventually proved to be one source of additional
general revenue that legislators were willing to tap during
this past session. While the Rape Crisis Program Trust Fund
was held harmless, the legislature raided the Crimes Compensation
Trust Fund.
In the state budget for fiscal year 2008/2009
that begins July 1st, the legislature swept $10 million from
the Crimes Compensation Trust Fund which will go into the
general revenue fund. It will be impossible to distinguish
exactly how that $10 million is used once it is part of the
state’s overall cash balance.
This sweep is by far the greatest hit on the
Crimes Compensation Trust Fund this year though legislators
also chose to include some other minor fund shifts from general
revenue to the crimes compensation trust fund including $400,000
in funding for rape crisis centers and slightly upwards of
$1 million in salaries and benefits in the Office of the Attorney
General that were funded through now non-existent general
revenue in previous years.
Increases in Benefit
Payouts
In addition to the $10 million sweep and minor fund shifts,
payouts for victim compensation benefits have increased 48%
over the past five years, with a corresponding 29% increase
in the number of claims received. This is due in large part
to increased awareness of the availability of benefits. To
a lesser extent, benefit increases during the last several
years, including the reimbursement rate for sexual battery
forensic examinations and provider payments, have impacted
payouts.
Each year, the Office of the Attorney General
Division of Victim Services is given the authority through
the budget to pay out a certain amount in claims—typically
around $26 million. As a result of increased benefit payouts,
the Division lacked sufficient budget authority during the
past fiscal year to pay all of the claims they received. Consequently,
additional authority was requested from the legislature to
continue to pay benefits. Because trust fund expenditures
exceeded collections into the trust fund during the past fiscal
year, benefit reductions were put into effect. The
$10 million trust fund sweep makes it unlikely that benefit
levels will be increased any time soon.
Overall Health
of the Crimes Compensation Trust Fund
Like economics in general, assessing the overall health of
the crimes compensation trust fund is as much about forecasts
and educated guesses as it is about hard facts. What is known
is that as of April 30, 2008, the Crimes Compensation Trust
Fund carried a balance of about $25 million. This is a fairly
typical balance for the trust fund though sometimes it is
higher. The balance will be reduced by $10 million on July
1st when the sweep takes effect. Questions that remain include
how the sweep will ultimately impact the health of the trust
fund, whether benefit payouts will continue to increase and
whether fine collections will keep pace with the need for
benefits.
How does all of
this affect VOCA grants and victims services?
The short answer is not at all. Although federal funding for
VOCA grants flows through the Crimes Compensation Trust Fund,
it is a direct reimbursement by the federal government. VOCA
victim services grants are being cut significantly, but these
cuts are a result of a $35 million reduction in the federal
VOCA cap in the most recent budget passed by Congress.
Crimes Compensation Benefit
Reductions
Benefit reductions took effect June 3, 2008 and include:
• A reduction in the percentage reimbursement for providers
of mental health care and other medical services from 75%
to 66%;
• A decrease in the overall mental health benefit for
minors from $10,000 to $5,000; and
• A decrease in the overall mental health benefit for
adults from $5000 to $2500.
Employee
Leave Now Available for
Victims of Sexual Violence and their Family Members
Benefits:
• 3 days of leave in a 12-month period
• Includes victims of many types of sexual violence
• Includes non-reporting victims and those whose cases
did not progress
• Includes family and household members
• Employer must keep information confidential.
• Information is exempt from public record.
• Victim can sue if leave is not given.
Limitations:
• Employee must have worked for employer for 3 months
• Employer must have 50 or more employees
• Other types of leave must be exhausted.
Governor Crist is expected to sign
HB 489 into law any day now, giving victims of sexual violence
the ability to take leave from their employment to deal with
issues arising from the crime. This new statutory right, however,
is hidden away in the domestic relations chapter of the Florida
Statutes in the domestic violence section (FS 741.313). It
will be imperative for advocates to proactively educate victims
about their right to take leave under this statute since it
is unlikely that victims will know about it or find it for
themselves.
The definition of sexual violence in the new
law is broad and covers both reporting and non-reporting victims
and their families and household members. Crimes included
in the definition of sexual violence include sexual battery,
lewd and lascivious acts committed against a minor, luring
or enticing a child, sexual performance by a child, any other
forcible felony wherein a sexual act is committed regardless
of whether criminal charges based on the incident were filed,
and any crime the underlying factual basis of which has been
found by a court to include an act of sexual violence.
The bill allows victims and/or their family
members to take up to three (3) days of leave in a 12 month
period. The employee must have been working for an employer
for at least (3) months to be eligible for the leave. The
leave can be paid or unpaid at the discretion of the employer
and only applies to employers with 50 or more employees. Other
paid leave available to the employee would have to be exhausted
first before making use of this leave.
The employer has the right to ask for reasonable
documentation to ascertain whether or not the employee is
a victim of sexual violence. If any employer fails to grant
a victim of sexual violence this leave, the victim would have
a right to sue the employer for damages. Any identifying information
provided by the victim to document the leave is confidential
and exempt from public information.
Legislature
Passes Stronger Confidentiality Protections
for Victims of Sexual Violence
Each public records exemption in Florida Statute
must be reviewed five years after it is enacted and must be
proactively re-enacted by the legislature or it is automatically
repealed. During the 2008 legislative session, a statute making
confidential and exempt any criminal intelligence information
or criminal investigative information that is a photograph,
videotape, or image of any part of the body of the victim
of certain sexual offenses, regardless of whether it identifies
the victim, was under review.
Rather than simply suggesting the reenactment
of the statute, House and Senate staff recommended making
all identifying information about victims of sexual offenses
and child abuse both confidential and exempt and expanding
the protections to victims of forced prostitution, sex trafficking
and child pornography. They also suggested making information
about victims in court records and court proceedings proactively
confidential.
FCASV staff along with Senate and House staff
(especially Jim Rhea, Mike Erickson and Heather Williamson),
Michael Ramage, FDLE, Meg Baldwin, executive director of Refuge
House and Jay Howell, victim rights attorney worked diligently
during the early weeks of session to craft language that would
provide the strongest protections for victims while ensuring
that law enforcement had the tools it needs to find the missing
and/or exploited and wholeheartedly pursue criminal investigations.
The bill amended s. 92.56, F.S., relating to
court records, to provide that the confidential and exempt
status of the criminal investigative information and the criminal
intelligence information must be maintained in court records
and in court proceedings. If a petition for access to such
confidential and exempt information is filed with the trial
court having jurisdiction over the alleged offense, the confidential
and exempt status must be maintained by the court if the state
or the victim demonstrates that the criteria currently provided
in s. 92.56, F.S. are met.
Previously, it was necessary to proactively
ask the Court to hold confidential certain information about
a victim of a sex offense in court records (through a Victims’
Protection Act motion, for example), It will now be an assumption
that this information is confidential unless a defendant specifically
petitions for its disclosure to prepare a defense and meets
certain criteria.
The legal differences between the concepts of
“exempt” and “confidential” are quite
complicated. Because this legislation raises the privacy status
of information about victim of sexual offenses in most cases
from “exempt” only to “confidential and
exempt” it is important to look at how these concepts
differ. If the Legislature makes certain records confidential,
with no provision for its release such that its confidential
status will be maintained, such information may not be released
by an agency to anyone other than to the persons or entities
designated in the statute. If a record is not made confidential
but is simply exempt from mandatory disclosure requirements,
an agency is not prohibited from disclosing the record in
all circumstances.
While this legislation promises to hold the
confidentiality of victim information even more securely,
it will take several years to gauge the full impact of the
changes. FCASV asks advocates to make note of any positive
or negative effects on victims as the legislation is implemented.
2008
Awards Luncheon Honors Outstanding Advocates
The 2008 Awards Luncheon held during the joint
conference of FCASV and the Florida Network of Victim Witness
Services (FNVWS) honored many outstanding men and women.
Recipients of the FCASV Outstanding Legislator
Award were Senator Paula Dockery, (R-Lakeland); Representative
Evan Jenne (D-Davie); and Senator Arthenia Joyner (D-Tampa).
Senator Paula Dockery put victims’
issues at the forefront of her work as chair of the Senate
Criminal Justice committee, including sponsoring legislation
to protect victims of child pornography via the internet,
ensuring that all victims are protected from contact by the
offender during the entirety of the offender’s incarceration,
and increasing confidentiality protections for victims of
sexual violence. She also co-sponsored legislation to protect
school children from bullying and to create a state task force
on trafficking.
Rep. Evan Jenne sponsored FCASV’s
priority legislation to ensure that victims of sexual violence
can take leave from their employment to deal with issues arising
from the crime. Rep. Jenne was a real fighter for us and when
it looked like business interests were going to offer an unfriendly
amendment, he made it clear that he would fight all the way
to defeat any amendment that weakened the bill. He was steadfast
in his determination to see that the best possible bill passed
for victims of sexual violence and did an excellent job maneuvering
the bill through the process.
Senator Arthenia Joyner was
once again the most stalwart of champions for rape crisis
center funding. As our sponsor, she refused to let the issue
get pushed to the side—bringing it up again and again
in behind-the-scenes negotiations. She is passionate about
the need for our services. She also chaired the Legislative
Women’s Caucus and brought a renewed focus to the issue
of trafficking both as chair of the Caucus and through legislation
proposing to create a statewide task force to look more deeply
into the issue of trafficking and create harsher penalties
for those engaged in sex trafficking both internationally
and here in Florida. Though the trafficking bills did not
pass this year, Joyner spoke eloquently of the need to prioritize
this work in the Senate. She co-sponsored our employee leave
bill, and when the bill entered a log jam in the Judiciary
committee, she made sure, as co-chair, that the bill was heard
and moved forward. More than anything, though, she is always
available and ready to help with any issues to benefit victims
of sexual violence.
Attorney General Bill McCollum and Jay Howell,
Esq. of Jacksonville received the Elizabeth Knake Outstanding
Advocate Award.
Attorney General McCollum was
a champion for children exploited via the internet both through
funding priorities and substantive legislation. He prioritized
rape crisis center funding and directed his staff to push
for our funding at every possible opportunity.
Jay Howell, Esq. has provided
free legal advice and information for advocates and victims
of sexual violence for years. He authored and worked to pass
legislation giving victims standing in the court to require
that their rights be enforced—Florida is one of the
few states in the country to pass such a law. He was also
the chief editor of constitutional issues in key 2008 legislation
rewriting the statutory confidentiality protections for victims
of sex offenses.
Margaret Baldwin, Esq., Executive
Director of Refuge House in Tallahassee received the Anne
Gannon Warrior for Women Award. Some do not know the special
role the staff of the Tallahassee rape crisis center play
in terms of influencing legislation. They are often called
on to play a much larger role in policy because they are in
the Capitol City! Meg has provided amazing legal and ethics
guidance on a variety of legislative and policy issues including
night and weekend drafting of victim confidentiality language
and meetings with legislators to discuss ways to improve legislation
addressing prostitution. As chair of the FCASV Public Policy
Committee, Meg has consistently brought her legal expertise
and high ethical standards to her work. She has been a champion
for prostituted women both at Refuge House and previously
as a law professor at the FSU Law School.
Award recipients of the FNVWS Carol Sheridan
Award went to the Miami Police Department Victim Advocate
Program; Sharon Komlos D’Eusanio Award to Rose Grier
for the “It’s Not Your Fault” Boundary Establishment
& Accountability Program for Teens; Victim Advocate Purple
Heart to Kattia Castellanos, Coral Gables Police Department;
James Fogarty Award to Katherine Fernandez-Rundle, State Attorney
11th Judicial Circuit; and the Lois Messer Scholarship to
Barbara Tarpley, Pinellas County Sheriff’s Office.
|